Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://adhlui.com.ui.edu.ng/jspui/handle/123456789/3581
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Abiodun-Solanke, I.M.F | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ajayi, D.M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Egbe, A | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-19T09:25:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-03-19T09:25:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Afr .J. Med. Med. Sci. (2019) 48, 257-264 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1116-4077 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://adhlui.com.ui.edu.ng/jspui/handle/123456789/3581 | - |
dc.description | Article | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Resin bonded bridges (RBB) was introduced as an alternative to conventional bridges tor tooth replacement under certain clinical conditions. It was designed as a temporary restoration which is reversible and the clinicians' major concern has been its longevity. The major cause of failure was attributed to de-bonding caused by complex multi- directional inter-abutment stresses associated with the 3-unit bridge that challenges the retainer and adhesive bond. The study aimed to assess the attitude, knowledge and practice of resident doctors on the performance factors of RBB. Methods: Across-sectional study conducted amongst residents at an update course using self-administered questionnaires. The first part of the questionnaire consisted of questions related to participants' socio-demographics, intended area of expertise, years of experience and percentage of RBBs performed in their clinical prosthodontic / restorative practice. The second part of the questionnaire comprised close-ended multiple-choice questions which were designed to extract the opinion and understanding of the respondents regarding performance factor for RBBs. The questions were related to clinical indications, prosthesis design etc. Results: Eighty percent of the participants indicated that had <10% tooth replacement service was done with RBB, 44.7% of the respondents considered RBB as a provisional restoration while 28 (36.8%) regarded RBB as both provisional and permanent restoration. About 76% of the respondents believe that perforated retainers were associated with clinical success of RBBs. 70% considered anterior maxilla as the most favorable location while class 1 jaw relation was preferred by 6 0 % of participants Conclusion: With less than 10% of teeth replacement done using RBBs, there is a need for continuing education opportunities for practicing dentists and better exposure of undergraduate and postgraduate students to clinical application of RBBs. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN, NIGERIA | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN, NIGERIA | en_US |
dc.subject | Perception | en_US |
dc.subject | Practice | en_US |
dc.subject | Resident doctors | en_US |
dc.subject | Resin bonded | en_US |
dc.subject | Bridges | en_US |
dc.title | Resident doctors' perception and practice of resin-bonded bridges | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Abiodun-Solanke,IMF et al_Resident_2019.pdf | Article | 14.06 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in COMUI (ADHL) are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.