Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://adhlui.com.ui.edu.ng/jspui/handle/123456789/3581
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbiodun-Solanke, I.M.F-
dc.contributor.authorAjayi, D.M-
dc.contributor.authorEgbe, A-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-19T09:25:30Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-19T09:25:30Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationAfr .J. Med. Med. Sci. (2019) 48, 257-264en_US
dc.identifier.issn1116-4077-
dc.identifier.urihttp://adhlui.com.ui.edu.ng/jspui/handle/123456789/3581-
dc.descriptionArticleen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Resin bonded bridges (RBB) was introduced as an alternative to conventional bridges tor tooth replacement under certain clinical conditions. It was designed as a temporary restoration which is reversible and the clinicians' major concern has been its longevity. The major cause of failure was attributed to de-bonding caused by complex multi- directional inter-abutment stresses associated with the 3-unit bridge that challenges the retainer and adhesive bond. The study aimed to assess the attitude, knowledge and practice of resident doctors on the performance factors of RBB. Methods: Across-sectional study conducted amongst residents at an update course using self-administered questionnaires. The first part of the questionnaire consisted of questions related to participants' socio-demographics, intended area of expertise, years of experience and percentage of RBBs performed in their clinical prosthodontic / restorative practice. The second part of the questionnaire comprised close-ended multiple-choice questions which were designed to extract the opinion and understanding of the respondents regarding performance factor for RBBs. The questions were related to clinical indications, prosthesis design etc. Results: Eighty percent of the participants indicated that had <10% tooth replacement service was done with RBB, 44.7% of the respondents considered RBB as a provisional restoration while 28 (36.8%) regarded RBB as both provisional and permanent restoration. About 76% of the respondents believe that perforated retainers were associated with clinical success of RBBs. 70% considered anterior maxilla as the most favorable location while class 1 jaw relation was preferred by 6 0 % of participants Conclusion: With less than 10% of teeth replacement done using RBBs, there is a need for continuing education opportunities for practicing dentists and better exposure of undergraduate and postgraduate students to clinical application of RBBs.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE, UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN, NIGERIAen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE, UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN, NIGERIAen_US
dc.subjectPerceptionen_US
dc.subjectPracticeen_US
dc.subjectResident doctorsen_US
dc.subjectResin bondeden_US
dc.subjectBridgesen_US
dc.titleResident doctors' perception and practice of resin-bonded bridgesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Abiodun-Solanke,IMF et al_Resident_2019.pdfArticle14.06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in COMUI (ADHL) are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.