Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://adhlui.com.ui.edu.ng/jspui/handle/123456789/2272
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRotimi, E. Ola-
dc.contributor.authorImosemi, O. D-
dc.contributor.authorAbudu, O. O-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-22T10:47:00Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-22T10:47:00Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.citationAfr. J. Med. Med. Sci. (2001) 30:61-66en_US
dc.identifier.issn1116-4077-
dc.identifier.urihttp://adhlui.com.ui.edu.ng/jspui/handle/123456789/2272-
dc.descriptionArticleen_US
dc.description.abstractVaginal birth (or trial of labour) after previous Caesarean delivery represents one of the most significant changes in obstetric practice. A five-year retrospective study was carried out at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital to determine the obstetric outcome after a previous Caesarean section and also to identify significant clinical factors that arc predictive of successful subsequent vaginal delivery. Hospital records of 101 patients with previous Caesarean births and 105 patients without a previous Caesarean delivery were examined, the later group serving as control. Successful vaginal delivery occurred in 74 (73.3%)) in the trial group and 90 (85.7%) in the control group. The Caesarean section rate was significantly higher in the trial group (P < 0.01). In the trial group, clinical factors found to predict successful vaginal delivery were a history of previous vaginal delivery (88.1%), infants birth weight less than 4kg (75%), gestational age less than 40 weeks (83.2%) and spontaneous onset of labour (82.1%). 63.6% of patients whose indications for previous Caesarean section were due to ecphalo pelvic disproportion/ arrest of labour were successfully delivered vaginally. This indicates that each patient should be selected for appropriate management based on individual merits independent of past indication for caesarean section. Clinical factors found not to favour successful vaginal delivery were fetal macrosomia, post dates and induced labour. Uterine rupture/dehiscence occurred in 3 (2.97%) patients. No maternal or perinatal death occurred. We conclude from this study that trial of labour in carefully selected patients with previous Caesarean delivery poses low level of risk for both the mother and the baby and that its use is an important component of efforts to lower the rate of repeat Caesarean birth.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCOLLEGE OF MEDICINEen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectVaginal birth after Caesarean sectionen_US
dc.subjecttrial of labouren_US
dc.subjectlow uterine caesarean sectionen_US
dc.subjectobstetric practiceen_US
dc.titleVaginal birth after one previous Caesarean section - evaluation of predictive factorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Rotimi et al_viginal_2001.pdfArticle13.1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in COMUI (ADHL) are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.