Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://adhlui.com.ui.edu.ng/jspui/handle/123456789/2838
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOgugua, AJ-
dc.contributor.authorAkinseye, VO-
dc.contributor.authorAyoola, MC-
dc.contributor.authorOyesola, OO-
dc.contributor.authorShima, FK-
dc.contributor.authorTijjani, AO-
dc.contributor.authorOgunbode, AA-
dc.contributor.authorMusa, NA-
dc.contributor.authorAdesokan, HK-
dc.contributor.authorPerrett, L-
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, A-
dc.contributor.authorStack, JA-
dc.contributor.authorMoriyon, I-
dc.contributor.authorCadmus, SIB-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-29T12:29:59Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-29T12:29:59Z-
dc.date.issued2014-09-
dc.identifier.citationAfr. J. Med. med. Sci. (sept.,2014) 43,Suppl: 121-129en_US
dc.identifier.issn1116-4077-
dc.identifier.urihttp://adhlui.com.ui.edu.ng/jspui/handle/123456789/2838-
dc.descriptionArticleen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Available reports on brucellosis in Nigeria arc largely confined to cattle while it is believed that other ruminants like sheep and goats are equally exposed to the disease. To have an insight into the role of goats in the epidemiology of brucellosis in Nigeria. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional study between June 2011 and May 2013 to determine the scroprcvalcnce of brucellosis in goats in some selected states in Nigeria. Serum samples were collected from goats at different locations and tested for antibodies to Brucella spp using the Rose Bengal Test (RBT), samples positive by RBT were further subjected to Competitive Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (cELISA). Data collected to determine risk factors were also analyzed using STATA 12 software and tested with chi-square and logistics regression statistics. Results: From a total of 2827 samples tested across the states (Bonus = 331; Borno = 195; Oyo = 2155; Sokoto = 146), we recorded an overall scroprcvalcnce of 2.83% (Bonus = 17.30%; Borno = 2.05%; Oyo = 0.60% and Sokoto = 0.00%) by RBT. The cELISA further supported 9.45% (7/74) of the total RBT positive samples. Logistic regression analysis showed that location (p = 0.004) and source (p < 0.0001); are probable risk factors to be considered in the epidemiology of brucellosis with sex (p = 0.179); age (p = 0.791) and breed (p = 0.369) not playing any major role. Conclusion: Our findings reveal a relatively low scroprcvalcnce of brucellosis among goats screened except for Benue State. Since most of the goats sampled in the present study were from abattoirs, further farm level investigations are required to determine role of goats in the epidemiology of brucellosis in Nigeria. This becomes important since they share common environment with sheep and cattle that are also natural hosts of Brucella species which pose major threat to public health.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCOLLEGE OF MEDICINEen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCOLLEGE OF MEDICINEen_US
dc.subjectBrucellosisen_US
dc.subjectcaprineen_US
dc.subjectepidemiologyen_US
dc.subjectzoonosis, Nigeriaen_US
dc.subjectnigeriaen_US
dc.titleSeroprevalcMice and risk factors of brucellosis in goats in selected states in Nigeria and the public health implicationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ogugua et al_Seroprevalance_2014.pdfArticle16.86 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in COMUI (ADHL) are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.