Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://adhlui.com.ui.edu.ng/jspui/handle/123456789/2149
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorODELOLA, H. A-
dc.contributor.authorJAIYEBO, OPEYEMI-
dc.contributor.authorANUKAM, P. A-
dc.contributor.authorAKANNI, A. O-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-15T11:56:18Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-15T11:56:18Z-
dc.date.issued1989-
dc.identifier.citationAfr. J. Med. Med. Sci. (1989) 18. 307-310.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1116-4077-
dc.identifier.urihttp://adhlui.com.ui.edu.ng/jspui/handle/123456789/2149-
dc.descriptionArticleen_US
dc.description.abstractSix brands of ampicillin and four of gentamicin were compared for their in-vitro antibacterial activity against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The minimum inhibitory concentrations obtained for each brand against each bacterial isolate compared very well with one another, and the kinetics of bactericidal activity showed that the brands of each antibiotic possessed similar activity against the clinical isolates tested.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCOLLEGE OF MEDICINEen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBLACKWELL SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONSen_US
dc.subjectampicillinen_US
dc.subjectgentamicinen_US
dc.subjectantibacterialen_US
dc.subjectantibioticen_US
dc.subjectclinicalen_US
dc.subjectkineticsen_US
dc.titleComparative in-vitro antibacterial activity of two brands of antibiotics against clinical isolates of some bacterial generaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Odelola et al_Comparative_1989.pdfArticle5.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in COMUI (ADHL) are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.