Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://adhlui.com.ui.edu.ng/jspui/handle/123456789/1125
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAFOLAYAN, O.D.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-29T13:46:38Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-29T13:46:38Z-
dc.date.issued2015-03-
dc.identifier.urihttp://adhlui.com.ui.edu.ng/jspui/handle/123456789/1125-
dc.descriptionA Dissertation submitted to the Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, in partial fulfillment for the requirement of the award of Masters of Public Health in Field Epidemiology, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe prevention, control and reduction of mortality from epidemics are dependent on an effective surveillance system. Epidemic-prone diseases continue to occur with increased frequency in epidemic proportions and produce the highest case fatality rate in Nigeria. Surveillance has been recognized to be weak in Nigeria. This study is aimed at assessing compliance with the surveillance and response guidelines for epidemic-prone diseases among surveillance units in Oyo state. A cross-sectional study was conducted assessing the performance of the core surveillance activities for epidemic-prone diseases as stipulated by the National Technical Guideline for Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response. Data was obtained by records review, checklists and questionnaires that sought information on socio-demographics, knowledge on disease surveillance, core surveillance activities and support functions from all surveillance units. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square and multiple logistic regression at p=0.05 on SPSS version 20. Majority of the surveillance units (82.4%) had a reporting practice. However. 6 months and 1 year compliance with the monthly reporting guideline were 77.4% and 65.8% respectively. At the health facility level, utilization of standard case definition was 25.9%, laboratory case confirmation was 85.7%, accurate case records ·was 95.2%, and analysis of surveillance data was 2.6%. At the local government level, analysis of surveillance data was 77.78%, epidemic preparedness was weak while surveillance support were adequate. In a multiple logistic regression model, predictors for compliance with monthly reporting guideline for 6 months were training (OR=7.917; Cl=1.653 - 37.919), knowledge on surveillance data flow pathway (OR=4.804; CI=l.636 - 14.104), adequacy of funds (OR=27.805; CI=7.683 - 100.6) and 21-30 years of service (OR=6.412; Cl=l.357 - 30.309). Predictors for 1 year reporting compliance were training (OR=5.668; Cl=2.040 - 15.753) and adequacy of funds (OR=3.932; CI=1.820 - 8.497). Local and State governments need to ensure the provision of continuous training and resources to surveillance workers to achieve effective disease control.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCompliance with epidemic prone disease surveillanceen_US
dc.subjectSurveillance uniten_US
dc.subjectEpidemic-prone diseasesen_US
dc.titleCOMPLIANCE WITH EPIDEMIC-PRONE DISEASE SUREVEILLANCE AND RESPONSE GUIDELINES AMONG SURVEILLANCE UNITS IN SELECTED LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS OF OYO STATEen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Dissertations in Epidemiology and Medical Statistics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
UI_Dissertation_Afolayan_OD_Compliance_2015.pdfDissertation11.91 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in COMUI (ADHL) are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.